Archive | February, 2011

Judge, lawyers urge parole in 1970s bus kidnap

24 Feb

SAN FRANCISCO—Fred Woods and brothers Richard and Jim Schoenfeld captured the nation’s attention in 1976 when they used guns and nylon masks to commandeer a Chowchilla school bus and buried the 26 children and driver in a truck underground.

It wasn’t long, however, before the kidnappers fell asleep long enough for their captives to escape without any serious injuries. The men—all in their mid-20s—were soon arrested, convicted and sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole.

The case has now taken an even more unusual turn, with the judges, prosecutors and investigators who sent the men to prison rallying in support of their push for parole.

“They were just dumb, rich kids and they paid a

FILE – In this July 29, 1976 file photo, Richard Schoenfeld leaves the Alameda County Jail in Oakland, Calif. Schoenfeld, his brother James Schoenfeld and Frederick N. Woods are up for parole again and this time, they have the support of the judge, prosecutors and investigators who handled their notorious case. The trio was convicted of abducting 26 children and their bus driver and hiding them underground in a rock quarry. The victims managed to escape after 36 hours, and none were seriously injured. ((AP Photo))

hell of a price for what they did,” said Dale Fore, who served as lead investigator on the case for the Madera County Sheriff’s Department.

Fore was among a group of supporters who attended a news conference Wednesday to draw attention to the case at San Francisco Civic Center, near the state Supreme Court building.

“I might not be the most popular guy when I get back home,” Fore said, acknowledging that no victims have publicly supported parole for the three men. “But what is right is right. How much time do you want out of these guys?”

Retired Court of Appeal Justice William Newsom, who overturned the three men’s original sentence of life in prison without parole, noted that nobody was injured in the kidnapping.  “That’s a major factor,” he said. “I think it’s a gross injustice.”

Continue Reading…..

California must rein in its prison guard costs

24 Feb

The federal government has avoided its responsibilities in protecting the nation’s borders and reforming outdated immigration laws. Now federal officials are trying to avoid paying for illegal immigrants convicted of state crimes in California.

The cost to imprison illegal immigrants convicted of crimes should be a shared responsibility. Since 1995, Congress has forced the federal government to pay a per-diem cost based on prison guard salaries. But now the federal government is resisting.

California has 18,300 deportable inmates among the 156,000 inmates in the state’s 33 prisons. The question is what is a reasonable federal cost of imprisoning illegal immigrants. President George W. Bush tried to end the reimbursement program, and President Barack Obama wants to make deep cuts because of the nation’s dire deficit and debt situation.

Obama would give the state prison system $32.8 million, roughly the equivalent of covering only $9,000 of a guard’s salary. The state is correct in its complaint that the federal government is not picking up its fair share of the cost.

The state is appealing to California’s congressional delegation to hold to 2010 reimbursement levels of $88.1 million.

Roughly, that would be the equivalent of about $24,100 per guard. That’s still low, but probably realistic given the nation’s budget situation. Gov. Jerry Brown included that amount in his budget proposal.

Continue Reading….

Seven prison guards arrested on charges of beating inmate

22 Feb

By Rhonda Cook

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Seven Georgia prison guards were arrested Monday on charges of beating an inmate, inflicting injuries so severe that the prisoner was in the hospital for “an extended period of time,” according to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.

GBI spokesman John Bankhead said the seven — Christopher Hall, Ronald Lach, Derrick, Wimbush, Willie Redden, Darren Douglass Griffin, Kerry Bolden and Delton Rushin — were arrested Monday morning when they reported to work at Macon State Prison. The facility is located in Oglethorpe, about 50 miles southwest of Macon.

All are charged with aggravated battery and violating their oaths of office.

At the request of Corrections Commissioner Brian Owens, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation was asked to investigate allegations of incidents at Macon State Prison and Smith State Prisons on January 5, 2011.

“I appreciate the GBI’s swift response in investigating these allegations and assisting with the Department’s non-negotiable mission of protecting the public,” Owens said. “We have an obligation to protect the public and that includes staff and inmates.”

Continue Reading….

Christopher Hall is one of seven prison guards arrested Monday, Feb. 21 on charges of beating an inmate.

GBI Christopher Hall is one of seven prison guards arrested Monday, Feb. 21 on charges of beating an inmate.

Derrick Wimbush is one of seven prison guards arrested Monday, Feb. 21 on charges of beating an inmate.

GBI Derrick Wimbush is one of seven prison guards arrested Monday, Feb. 21 on charges of beating an inmate.

Ronald Lach is one of seven prison guards arrested Monday, Feb. 21 on charges of beating an inmate.

GBI Ronald Lach is one of seven prison guards arrested Monday, Feb. 21 on charges of beating an inmate.

Darren Douglas is one of seven prison guards arrested Monday, Feb. 21 on charges of beating an inmate.

GBI Darren Douglas is one of seven prison guards arrested Monday, Feb. 21 on charges of beating an inmate.

AMMIANO INTRODUCES BILL TO CREATE TIERED REGISTRATION FOR SEX OFFENDERS IN CALIFORNIA

22 Feb

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 22, 2011
Contact: Quintin Mecke
Office: 415-557-3013; Cell: 415.505.2417

 

AMMIANO INTRODUCES BILL TO CREATE TIERED REGISTRATION

FOR SEX OFFENDERS IN CALIFORNIA

 

Sacramento – Assemblymember Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) has introduced a bill, AB 625, to create a Tiered Registration system for sex offenders in California.  The bill is based on the recommendations of the California Sex Offender Management Board, which was created in 2006 by Governor Schwarzenegger to improve policies and practices regarding the management of sex offenders. California is one of only four states (Alabama, Florida, South Carolina) that require lifetime registration for all convicted sex offenders regardless of offense.

 

“With the skyrocketing costs of corrections in California, we need to base our management and enforcement of sex offenders on the research and data available rather than emotion.  This means focusing our efforts and resources on the most dangerous offenders to ensure that the registry achieves its primary goal – to keep our children and communities safe,” said Ammiano.

 

“California needs to modify its current policy and start devoting our limited resources to those individuals who pose the greatest risk of re-offending.  Common sense and solid research both agree that not all sex offenders pose the same degree of risk of re-offending.  Many pose very little risk.  Unless one accepts the myth that “all sex offenders are alike,” there can be no defensible justification for treating them all the same and requiring lifetime registration for each and every convicted sex offender.  This puts an increasing burden on law enforcement and does not make our communities any safer,” said Tom Tobin, Ph.D., California Sex Offender Management Board Vice-Chair.

 

The members of the California Sex Offender Management Board have recommended that California rethink its registration policies and move toward a smarter approach based on solid information about what is effective in managing sex offenders.

 

For the full Sex Offender Management Board report, go to:

http://www.casomb.org/docs/CASOMB%20Report%20Jan%202010_Final%20Report.pdf

 

###

 

 

Quintin Mecke

Communications Director

Office of Assemblymember Tom Ammiano

455 Golden Gate Avenue, #14300

San Francisco, CA 94102

Email: quintin.mecke@asm.ca.gov

Phone: 415.557.3013

Fax: 415.557.3015

Website: http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/a13/

Villalobos Rescue Center in Danger of Closing – Show support by signing please

20 Feb

Targeting: Tia Torres (Owner)
Started by: Doreen Adair

Villalobos Rescue Center in Danger of Closing BREAKING NEWS!!   VILLALOBOS RESCUE CENTER IN JEOPARDY OF CLOSING ITS DOORS.   As most of you know, we are in the process of building a new paradise up in the quaint little town of Tehachapi.  Known for its adorable antique stores and that awesome “choo choo” train, it was the country living that was so appealing.  So to move my program up into the secluded mountains, felt just right.   Never in my dreams would I think…

Villalobos Rescue Center in Danger of Closing

BREAKING NEWS!!

VILLALOBOS RESCUE CENTER IN JEOPARDY OF CLOSING ITS DOORS.

As most of you know, we are in the process of building a new paradise up in the quaint little town of Tehachapi.  Known for its adorable antique stores and that awesome “choo choo” train, it was the country living that was so appealing.  So to move my program up into the secluded mountains, felt just right.

Never in my dreams would I think that such an angry and hateful woman co-existed there.  I’ve never met this woman and yet a few days ago she sent out the attached letter.  In it she accuses me of “stealing government money” and basically compares me to the likes of the people involved in the Diane Whipple mauling.

Never once did she ask me or come to me with concerns as some of the other nice folk up there have. How sad is it that she complains about the conditions of their dirt roads being destroyed, when I offered to cover ALL EXPENSES so as not to have the local residents have the upkeep come out of their pockets anymore.  This woman lives nowhere near the new place yet she, for some reason wants to shut down an organization that helps men and women get on the right track to life, counsels troubled youth, has Girl and Boy Scouts visit on a regular basis and was willing to become the “unofficial” Tehachapi Animal Shelter and handle the stray dog population while attempting to find any “lost owners.  We had also set up a “Rewards Program” that we were willing to share with the local businesses, that would’ve given them more income and also bring in more donations for us.

I don’t know why this woman is doing this, but if she is successful in her angry quest, we will not be able to operate as a rescue any longer.  We are doing everything by the book by applying for the proper permits, etc. We have our county hearing on March 10th, 7:00 p.m. in Bakersfield. If you would like to send a letter/email of support or even show up, please email us at:pitbullrescue13@gmail.com and we’ll send out more information. Your letters have to be received by Feb. 22nd.  Please be polite and professional in your response.  Remember this is not an issue with the county.

In addition to all of the above, at this time Villalobos will have to partially suspend many of its services because we have to now focus on combatting this issue. Phone calls and emails will go unanswered for a period of time or at least until we can deal with all of this.

This battle is being fueled by this woman (letter attached) and again, not any county entities. We appreciate any and all support.  Many lives depend on it. We will no longer be able to save more dogs or continue our free spay/neuter program if she succeeds in her vicious war with us.  To even think about all those dogs having to be homeless once again is just heartbreaking.  Of course to think of a human being so heartless is even worse.

From the messy desk of,

Tia Maria Torres

Below please find the letter from the protestor.  Please do NOT respond to her.  Tia doesn’t want pit bull lovers and supporters be protrayed as threatening.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150090714616143&set=pu.172286261142&theater

Click HERE to continue reading and sign the petition!

Margaret Dooley-Sammuli: California taking a step back in drug treatment

20 Feb

Margaret Dooley-Sammuli is deputy state director, Southern California, for the Drug Policy Alliance, the nation’s leading organization working to end the war on drugs and a proponent of Prop. 36 in 2000.

Santa Cruz just became the latest county to announce it would “end” the Proposition 36 treatment-instead-of-incarceration program for low-level drug offenses because of a lack of funding. This terminology is confusing and misleading — even for those who should know better.

Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act, was approved by 61 percent of California voters in 2000 — and it can only be undone by the voters. That is, it doesn’t “end” simply because the state and county aren’t funding alcohol and drug treatment.

Counties that deny Prop. 36 participants access to adequate drug treatment, such as by providing support groups e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous rather than licensed care, provide grounds for each defendant to bring suit. Just as importantly, California courts simply cannot remand people to jail or prison for a petty drug offense if that defendant is eligible for and opts into probation under Prop. 36.

This is good news for California taxpayers.

According to UCLA research, Prop. 36 has helped reduce the number of people incarcerated for personal drug possession by 40 percent or 8,000 people, saves $2.5-$4 for every dollar invested more than $2 billion so far, diverted 36,000 people into treatment a year when funded, and has had no negative impact on crime trends. If those 8,000 people were still in prison, taxpayers would spend an additional $400 million on corrections this year alone.

Continue Reading…..

From Montgomery to Los Angeles and Beyond: Formerly Incarcerated People Building a Movement

19 Feb

It’s time to build a Civil and Human Rights Movement for the 21st Century. We hope you’ll join us – in Alabama, Los Angeles, and beyond.
February 18, 2011 |
TAKE ACTION
Petitions by Change.org

Would you feel like a full citizen if most of your civil and human rights were denied you? If the privileges afforded to community members were withheld from you, would you feel like a welcome member of the community? Probably not.

As formerly incarcerated people, every day is another reminder that we do not have full access to our civil and human rights. Having served our sentences and returned home, we face circumstances that often seem designed to prevent our full participation in our communities and country: stigma for having a criminal conviction. Barriers to gaining meaningful employment and decent housing. Barriers to constructive educational opportunities. Lack of access to healthcare. Denial of our voting rights.

This is a widespread problem. Consider this: there are nearly 2.4 million people incarcerated in prisons and jails in the U.S. today. Most people currently incarcerated are coming home — according to the Department of Justice, over 700,000 people were released from incarceration in 2006 alone. Across the country, over five million people are under state supervision like parole or probation. There are millions of people who are currently and formerly incarcerated, and millions more who were never incarcerated but have a criminal conviction–all of whom live, every day, without our full civil and human rights.

What happens when people’s civil and human rights are denied for too long? Movements for change spark and catch fire.

As we near the 46th anniversary of the Bloody Sunday March over the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama, we’re reminded of the Civil Rights Movement. For nearly 100 years after the end of chattel slavery, Black people were denied their human and civil rights, including the right to vote. People got tired and organized all over the country to win their rights. In Alabama, the movement was especially vibrant.

Continue Reading…..

Gang validation: The new inquisition

19 Feb

by Steve Champion

Steve Champion in a photo taken in 2007

On July 23, 2010, my cell was searched and three boxes of my property – legal material, books, notes and personal writings – were confiscated and turned over to Institutional Gang Investigations (IGI) for possible gang validation. The reason for the action, I was told, was my possession of a Kiswahili dictionary and the book “Soledad Brother” by George Jackson.

This is not the first time I have been targeted for a gang validation wherein George Jackson was the cause. In May 2007, I co-wrote an article in which we referred to Jackson as “Comrade George Jackson.” It was determined by IGI that the word “Comrade” constituted gang associate or sympathy; therefore, I needed to be investigated. The investigation yielded nothing.

I have been in San Quentin – and on death row – for almost 28 years, and for most of this time I have had George Jackson’s books in my cell. I ordered them through the prison Special Purchase Order (SPO). My cell has been searched hundreds if not thousands of times and never, not once, were George Jackson’s books taken.

Why now? And why the link to gang activity when it is well known that George Jackson was a member of the Black Panther Party and a political revolutionary? It is only by exposing the insidious and inscrutable use of politically charged books to label prisoners gang members, thereby criminalizing critical literacy, that we can arrive at answers. Both prisoners and prison activists need to understand how the Prison Industrial Complex (PIC) is using political and historical texts to repress prisoners.

My story is not new or unique. I’ve read numerous accounts from across the U.S. prison landscape – state and federal – of prisoners having books by George Jackson, Che Guevara, Chairman Mao and others stolen from their cells or confiscated under the false pretext of gang activity. Some prisoners have even been validated as gang members and locked away indefinitely in Security Housing Units (SHUs).

And in June 2010, a ruling by a California appeals court explicitly condoned the practice in California, as follows: “Assigning an inmate to secure housing based on his possession of constitutionally protected materials linking him to a gang [does] not violate his first amendment rights.”

Let’s be clear. The confiscation of leftist and revolutionary books, magazines and newspapers is not a mere First Amendment issue; failing to understand the bigger picture will just extend your stay in wonderland. Thus, I’m not going to argue a case of censorship – although one can certainly be made since none of the above authors have been ruled to be either dangerous or obscene by a court of law or the PIC.

I am interested in a much broader analysis that deconstructs the current ideology of suppression in U.S. prisons that can be traced to other interrelated post-9/11 realities, such as creation of Homeland Security and the gradual erosion of civil liberties; the prosecution of a global “war on terrorism”; the virtually unrestricted spending on and by intelligence agencies; and redefining domestic terrorism to meet the threat posed by gang violence.

 

Continue Reading…..

Tennessee’s lethal injection procedures are constitutional, judge rules

18 Feb

Usage of lethal injection for executions in th...

Image via Wikipedia

Protocol declared sufficient

A Davidson County judge ruled Wednesday that the state’s new lethal injection procedures are sufficient and constitutional.

Chancellor Claudia Bonnyman’s decision clears the way for the state to ask the Tennessee Supreme Court to reset the execution date for death row inmate Stephen Michael West. But defense attorneys said they would appeal Bonnyman’s ruling, which guarantees additional delays.

In November, 10 days before the Union County double murderer was to be executed in a Nashville prison, his lawyers argued that inmates are awake and in pain during the execution when given the drugs that paralyze the muscles and stop the heart. Bonnyman agreed and said the method of execution was unconstitutional because it allowed for “death by suffocation while the prisoner is conscious.”

In the state’s three-drug cocktail, the first drug, sodium thiopental, is supposed to render the inmate unconscious. Next, the inmate is given pancuronium bromide to paralyze the muscles, then potassium chloride to stop the heart.

After Bonnyman agreed with the evidence presented by the inmates’ lawyers, the state responded with the protocol to determine consciousness.

After sodium thiopental is shot through a prisoner’s veins to knock him unconscious, the warden will call out his name, shake him and brush his eyelashes. If the inmate showed a response, the warden would administer a second dose.

The check for consciousness “seems to take care of the problem,” Bonnyman said Wednesday.

Judge cites other states

In reaching that conclusion, the judge noted that 19 of the 36 states that use the three-drug lethal injection cocktail perform the consciousness checks. Bonnyman also said other higher courts nationwide have found the checks by the warden to be sufficient.

Continue Reading……

California Is Broke — You Still Have the Right to Avoid Prison

18 Feb

Santa Cruz just became the latest county to announce it would “end” treatment-instead-of-incarceration program for low-level drug offenses because of a lack of funding.
February 17, 2011 |AlterNet
TAKE ACTION
Petitions by Change.org

Santa Cruz just became the latest county to announce it would “end” CA‘s Proposition 36 treatment-instead-of-incarceration program for low-level drug offenses because of a lack of funding. This terminology is confusing and misleading – even for those who should know better.

Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act, was approved by 61% of California voters in 2000 – and it can only be undone by the voters. That is, it doesn’t “end” simply because the state and county aren’t funding alcohol and drug treatment.

Counties that deny Prop 36 participants access to adequate drug treatment, such as by providing support groups (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous) rather than licensed care, provide grounds for each defendant to bring suit. Just as importantly, California courts simply cannot remand people to jail or prison for a petty drug offense if that defendant is eligible for and opts into probation under Prop 36.

Continue Reading…..

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 12,891 other followers

%d bloggers like this: