Archive | June, 2012

“stomach-churning” – State sued over prison conditions

30 Jun

By Bruce Rushton

 

Conditions at Vienna Correctional Center are something out of a Dickens novel, judging by a stomach-churning lawsuit filed earlier this month by inmates who say they live with filth, vermin and a paucity of bathrooms.

A lawyer for inmates says that prisoners at Vienna and Vandalia Correctional Center, which could be the next legal target, are living in poorer conditions than inmates in California, which has been ordered to reduce overcrowding by a federal judge.

“We are worse than California,” says Alan Mills, legal director for the Uptown People’s Law Center in Chicago, which sued the state in federal court on June 13. “California is putting people in gymnasiums. But, to my knowledge, they are not putting people into basements or storage rooms.”

In addition to suing the state over conditions at Vienna Correctional Center, the Uptown People’s Law Center is considering a lawsuit over conditions at Vandalia Correctional Center, where minimum security inmates are held, Mills said. If the state doesn’t settle, lawsuits could take years to resolve, he said.

It is, Mills said, a matter of math. The inmate population has increased by 10 percent during the past two years while the state prison budget has decreased by 15 percent, he said. There is some hope in recently passed legislation that reinstitutes an early-release program for inmates who behave themselves, Mills said.

The legislature also appropriated $26 million to keep the Tamms supermax prison open. Gov. Pat Quinn says that he will close it nonetheless, and if the money is spent to expand a minimum security work camp next to the supermax, intolerable conditions might improve, Mills said.

Stacey Solano, Illinois Department of Corrections spokeswoman, said the department doesn’t comment on pending lawsuits, but health, safety and security of inmates and staff is the department’s top priority. She confirmed that Tamms will be closed, but declined to say how the department might spend money appropriated to keep the supermax open.
In the meantime, inmates are living in squalor, according to the class-action lawsuit filed on June 13 in federal court.

Nearly 1,900 prisoners are living in Vienna Correctional Center, which was built to hold 925 inmates, according to the lawsuit. While state law requires each inmate to have at least 50 square feet in cells or dormitories, inmates at Vienna have 33 square feet or less, the plaintiffs say. Inmates get three hours or less of exercise time each week, and much of their time is spent on bunks crammed 18 inches apart, so close that a prisoner can reach out and touch the person sleeping next to them.

Rather than fix broken windows, the state has boarded them up, depriving inmates of natural light and fresh air. Mice, rats, millipedes, cockroaches and other vermin run free, and food contains rodent feces and mold, according to the plaintiffs.

“Prisoners find cockroaches in their coffee cups, drinking glasses and toothbrushes and feel cockroaches crawl across them while they lie in their bunks,” the plaintiffs say. “The men often have to physically sweep cockroaches off of their mattresses and remove cockroach feces from their pillows and clothing.”

A converted administration building that is home to 600 inmates has seven toilets, two urinals, seven sinks and seven showers.

“To make matters worse, some of these toilets and sinks often do not function or drain properly due to leaking or clogged pipes,” the plaintiffs say. “Rust-colored water comes out of these few sinks, which the prisoners use to brush their teeth, wash their faces and ‘clean’ their dishes. Broken toilets are left filled with feces, sometimes for weeks.”

Mold is rampant.

“It grows along the walls and ceilings, in the light fixtures, around the sinks and drinking fountains, in the showers and behind the toilets,” the plaintiffs say. “The mold on the ceiling and in the showers sometimes grows so thick that it breaks off and falls on the prisoners while they are sleeping in their bunks or showering.”

Just five guards watch over the 600 inmates who live in the converted administration building.

“Because there are so many prisoners and so few officers, the officers are frequently unaware of the fights that occur in the dormitories and when the officers are aware, they often let the inmates fight it out, intervening only after the fight is finished in order to issue disciplinary citations,” plaintiffs say.

The conditions described in the lawsuit are confirmed in a report by the John Howard Association, a Chicago-based prison reform group that visited the prison last fall. The visitors smelled sewage and found inmates dodging rust-colored water that dripped from bathroom ceilings. Prisoners said they were given just five minutes to eat meals. Hundreds of inmates with nothing to do simply paced or huddled around a small television.

“A Vienna staff member seemed to recognize the stunned look on our faces,” the report’s author wrote. “‘This is a nightmare,’ he said quietly to one of JHA’s staff. ‘This should not be.’”

Via @ Illinois Times

 

Georgia Prison Strike

28 Jun

“four prisons in Georgia remain in lockdown five days after prisoners went on strike in protest of poor living and working conditions. Using cell phones purchased from guards, the prisoners coordinated the nonviolent protests to stage the largest prison strike in U.S. history….”

Prisoner Advocate Elaine Brown on Georgia Prison Strike: “Repression Breeds Resistance”

 

watch video….

Democracy Now

Inadequate health care for inmate Sal DiMasi is a crime too many convicts suffer

28 Jun

Yvonne Abraham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at abraham@globe.com

It’s gut-wrenching to read the court filing describing Sal DiMasi’s attempts to get treatment for his cancer. Those eight short pages reveal just how far the former speaker and current federal inmate has fallen: too far.

The man who was once one of the most powerful in the state found himself suddenly at the mercy of various prison officials, finding lumps on his neck and pleading for months for treatment as he traveled from Kentucky to a Massachusetts grand jury investigating the probation department.

According to the document, a request by his lawyers for more time to appeal his 2011 corruption conviction, the former speaker was so distracted by his untreated illness that he was barely able to discuss his case with his lawyer.

Even when he finally got to see doctors back in Kentucky, he was kept in the dark for weeks after his visits: “He continued to wait, scared, and frustrated—but nothing seemed to be happening.”

His wife Debbie, battling cancer herself, tried to help, but her husband’s doctor stopped returning her calls. DiMasi was finally sent for treatment on June 6, almost six months after he first discovered the lumps. His cancer has spread.

If all of this is true, it’s appalling. Yes, DiMasi deserves his imprisonment. He took payoffs, profiting from his power. But nobody should be treated this way. Not DiMasi, and not other inmates who have similar stories to tell. And they are many.

“While it’s true that some prisoners do receive adequate health care, it’s also true that prison health care is often frankly abysmal and results in needless suffering,” says David Fathi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union National Prison Project.

Continue Reading @BostonGlobe

 

How Facebook Helped a Small Town Fight Back Against a Crooked Cop

27 Jun

Friends and family of a woman murdered by a bad cop used social media to get answers and justice

 

 

Justice For Patricia Cook Page on FaceBook

 

Fifty-four-year-old Patricia Cook was shot to death on February 9 just outside a church parking lot in Culpeper, Virginia. The first two rounds, fired at point-blank range, tore into Cook’s face and arm. Another round, fired as Cook was driving away from the shooter, entered her brain. A fourth round severed her spine and veered into her heart, killing her. A telephone pole brought her Jeep Wrangler to a halt.

That week, local media in Culpeper (pop. 16,000) reported these few facts: Patricia Cook had been parked in front of Epiphany Catholic School for a long time and refused to leave. The school called the police. A Culpeper police officer confronted Cook. Cook rolled up the officer’s arm in her window and punched the gas. The officer did what he had to do to stop the vehicle and save his own life. The Virginia State Police were handling the investigation.

Cook was a 54-year-old homemaker and Methodist Sunday school teacher who hadn’t received so much as a speeding ticket since the 1970s. She enjoyed quilting and cooking for her congregation at Culpeper United Methodist Church. The Culpeper PD’s story didn’t sit well with Cook’s friends and family, but for months, it was the only one they would hear.

“After about the third week of February there was nothing else in the newspaper, or any other bigger outlet, on the story,” says James Jennings, the Culpeper resident who helped bring Cook’s story to the attention of national media. “By the end of March, it had been completely forgotten.”

Jennings, 56, is a former elementary school teacher and retired network engineer who’s lived in Culpeper since 1994. He didn’t know Cook personally, but says they shared some mutual friends. The week after the shooting, he read local media with a hawk’s eye, waiting for more information on the case. None came. (Anita Sherman, managing editor of the weekly Culpeper Times, rebuts this claim. “The Culpeper Times has carried stories relating to the Cook case on: 2/16, 2/23, 3/15, 3/22, 4/5, 5/10, 5/17, 5/24, 6/7, 6/14, and 6/28,” Sherman wrote in an email.)

Local residents flooded the comment boards of the Star-Exponent*. Under the guise of anonymity, they defended “Pat” Cook, and called for an investigation into the Culpeper Police Department. “Two weeks after the shooting, [the publication] stopped that,” Jennings says of the message boards. “It deleted all the existing comments and all the existing discussion on that.” The paper relaunched with Facebook commenting, requiring people to identify themselves. At that point, the message boards for the small-town paper went silent. “I think people were afraid to speak up,” Jennings says, adding, “there are a couple of bullies in town.”

Once the commenting stopped, it was like Patricia Cook had never existed.

The sudden absence of concern about how and why Cook died filled Jennings with guilt. “I felt like, boy, you know, here’s somebody just needs to speak up and say something. And in town there was just a lot of pressure against people speaking up and saying anything. So finally I just decided that I had to do something about it. I’m a Christian,” Jennings added, “and I just kept thinking of verses, ‘I was hungry, you fed me. I was naked, you clothed me.’ And then I thought, ‘My life was taken from me, will you speak up for me?’”

Jennings created the Facebook page “Justice for Patricia Cook” on April 23. The About section reads, “Please consider joining our community, encouraging justice for the unarmed 54 year old woman who was shot by a Culpeper Police Officer, under questionable circumstances.” Beneath that description are the following questions: “What if it was your wife? What if it was your mother, sister, daughter? Would you be willing to sit quietly and say nothing? What if you pulled the trigger? Wouldn’t you want to see justice?” Jennings also created a petition on Change.org, calling for a special prosecutor to bring charges against the officer who killed Cook.

The page Jennings created caught the attention of regional media. On April 28, the Star Exponent ran a story titled, “Citizen seeks answers in Pat Cook shooting.” On May 1, the local CBS affiliate WUSA 9 ran a story titled, “Citizen Wants ‘Open Investigation’ Into Officer-Involved Shooting Of Patricia Cook.” On May 14, the Charlottesville-based alternative weekly The Hook reported on Jennings’ petition, which had caught the attention of Albemarle Sheriff Chip Harding, a leading authority on using DNA in criminal investigations. ”Culpeper silence: Citizens, top cop slam shooting inquest,” read The Hook‘s headline. After nearly three months of government silence, Jennings had turned Patricia Cook’s death into Virginia’s biggest story in just two-and-a-half weeks.

The increased attention eventually led to the discovery of a witness whose testimony turned the entire Culpeper story upside down. Kris Buchele, a carpenter who was working near Epiphany on Feb. 9, told WUSA9 that “[Harmon-Wright] was not dragged and that he shot [Cook] before she drove away”; that “he didn’t have his arm caught because the officer’s left hand was on the door handle and right hand was holding a weapon”; that “he distinctly saw her roll up the window all the way before the officer shot out the glass and killed her.”

In other words, the official report initially parroted by Culpeper media and the Virginia State Police had some pretty big holes.

The coverage generated by Jennings’ Facebook page and petition finally broke the wall of silence. The Fauqier County special prosecutor told media outlets in late April that a special grand jury had been convened, and that its investigation would be done by June. (The indictment came early: Harmon-Wright was charged with Cook’s murder on May 29; his mother, a former administrative assistant with the Culpeper PD, was also indicted for altering her son’s records to hide a history rife with police abuse and department reprimands.)

By June 21, the day the Culpeper Police Department concluded its own investigation and fired Harmon-Wright, eight regional media outlets, including The Washington Post, were filing daily reports about the Patricia Cook case.

The investigation into Harmon-Wright likely would have gone forward regardless of Jennings’ creation of a Facebook page. It may have even concluded in his indictment without pressure from the media. This is, for instance, Sherman’s take. “As far as Jennings Facebook page, he has caused quite a stir with it dividing many in the community and forcing them to take sides,” she wrote in an email to Reason. “I wouldn’t give him credit for pushing the process forward. It has moved at its pace and can be perceived as moving slowly or expeditiously depending on your perspective.”

Continue Reading @ Reason.com

 

 

what you can do

25 Jun

Reblogged from Wandervogel Diary:

Click to visit the original post

I am still reeling from the implications of yesterday’s verdict. Yesterday James was despondent. He tried to hurt himself last night and is now under suicide watch. “My life is over,” he said.

By this afternoon his spirits rebounded to the point that I can safely say that if James’ life is to end, it will not be by his own hand.

Read more… 1,167 more words

The Supreme Court says it’s unconstitutional to sentence juveniles to life in prison without parole for murder.

25 Jun

The high court on Monday threw out Americans‘ ability to send children to prison for the rest of their lives with no chance of ever getting out. The 5-4 decision is in line with others the court has made, including ruling out the death penalty for juveniles and life without parole for young people whose crimes did not involve killing.

The decision came in the robbery and murder cases of Evan Miller and Kuntrell Jackson, who were 14 when they were convicted.

Miller was convicted of killing a man in Alabama. Jackson was convicted of being an accomplice in an Arkansas robbery that ended in murder.

 

SCOTUS opinion striking down Juvenile Life Without Parole: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-9646g2i8.pdf

 

 

Sheriff Arpaio to close Tent City ahead of SB 1070 protest

22 Jun

by Chelsey Davis

The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office will shut down all six of its jails Saturday because of a large protest expected in the evening.

Sheriff’s officials expect a protest by 1,000 to 4,000 activists at Tent City Jail near 29th Avenue and Durango Road in Phoenix, officials said. The shutdown means family and friends won’t be allowed to visit inmates at the jails for the entire day.

Puente Arizona and Unitarian Universalist Association officials said they will hold a peaceful vigil to protest Tent City and Senate Bill 1070. The Unitarians are holding a four-day convention at the Phoenix Convention Center with workshops, speakers and planned demonstrations.

Steve Carl, 67, a spokesman for the Unitarians, said the association discussed having an assembly in Arizona two years ago with the introduction of SB 1070 and decided to take action closer to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Arizona’s immigration law. The Supreme Court is expected to release its ruling soon.

“The main point is to show national disapproval of Arizona’s immigration laws,” Carl said. “Arizona is at the forefront of human violations and leading the way for other states in the country.”

Sheriff Joe Arpaio plans to be present at the demonstration to defend Tent City and his jail policies, officials said.

Several members of the convention gathered near Heritage Square on Thursday night for nearly an hour singing songs, praying and wearing shirts and showing banners.

High Cost, Low Return of Longer Prison Term

19 Jun

The Pew Charitable Trusts

The Pew Charitable Trusts (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

By Brian Heller de Leon

A new report by the Pew Charitable Trusts shows that the length of time served in prison has increased nationally by 36% since 1990. This has translated into an average of nine additional months of incarceration per prisoner. This results in extra costs to states totaling more than $10.4 billion per year. The study found that over half of those additional costs were spent on non-violent offenders who posed minimal risks to public safety. Nationally, states spend over $51 billion

each year on incarceration.

The nation is in a state of mass incarceration with the average national prison population spiking more than 700% between 1972 and 2011. Further, in 2008 the combined federal-state- local inmate count reached 2.3 million, or one in 100 adults. This increased reliance on incarceration is not entirely reflective of offender behavior.

Crime rates have been decreasing rapidly since the 1990’s yet incarceration rates continue to climb. States like California have undergone massive “realignment” efforts to return non-violent offenders back to county supervision, with impressive although uneven results.

The Pew study notes,

“Criminologists and policy makers increasingly agree that we have reached a ‘tipping point with incarceration, where additional imprisonment will have little if any effect on crime. Research also has identified new offender supervision strategies and technologies that can help break the cycle of recidivism.”

In a time of severe budget cuts where K-12 class sizes are increasing and kids are being pushed off health-care rolls, why do states continue to rely on costly incarceration strategies that clearly show diminished benefit over time?

The negative consequences of excessive lengths of stay are not only prevalent in the adult offender population. A May 5th CJCJ blog highlighted a recent OJJDP study that found that, “Long-term juvenile incarceration does not decrease reoffending, and may actually increase recidivism rates for lower-level youth offenders.”  Recent steps taken by Governor Brown and the California legislature include to reduce the age of jurisdiction at the state’s youth correctional facilities, Division of Juvenile Facilities (DJF) from 25 to 23, and to eliminate a disciplinary practice known as “time-adds”. Both of these actions will reduce youth offenders stay in the state system, which is currently longer than most states.

Used for disciplinary purposes on juvenile offenders (although research has shown they are ineffective for discipline), time-adds on average place an additional 22% on the average length of stay for juvenile wards in DJF. The California Legislature passed time-add elimination with Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner as AB 999 a few years ago, but the bill was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger under pressure from law enforcement associations. Now, Governor Brown has a chance to get it right.

Measures such as time-add elimination and reducing the age of jurisdiction will help mitigate the excessive lengths of stay in DJF, which are more than three times the national average. Governor Brown has a chance to take a small step this year in better aligning juvenile corrections in California with what research indicates are best practices.

The public is looking for smart, cost-effective solutions that actually promote long-term public safety. As these studies make clear, increased incarceration rates and lengths of stay across the country have made only minimal contributions to public safety while exacerbating the current fiscal crisis with prison overspending. Our elected leaders need to take courageous steps in following the evidence and resisting the old-guard law enforcement lobby in our statehouses and in the nation’s Capitol.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Brian Heller de Leon is the Policy and Government Outreach Coordinator for the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice, where this article was originally published. He has a background in community organizing, police-community relations, and the implementation of national best-practice strategies for youth and gang violence reduction.

 

Via @ California Progress Report

 


Supermax: The Faces of a Prison’s Mentally Ill

19 Jun

In a lawsuit filed yesterday, these inmates at America‘s most famous and secure prison allege a cycle of abuse and madness, neglect, and retribution.

Andrew Cohen

 

supermaxer.jpg

Index of Photographic Exhibits to Plaintiffs’ Complaint, Bacote, et al v. United States Bureau of Prisons, et Al.

 

You don’t get to be an inmate at ADX-Florence, America’s most famous and secure prison, without having first achieved a measure of infamy in the nation’s penal system. Name a convicted terrorist, foreign or domestic, and there is a strong likelihood that he is serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole at the maximum security federal facility in southern Colorado. Terry Nichols. Ramzi Yousef. Ted Kaczynski. Zacarious Moussaoui. Eric Robert Rudolph. Richard Reid. They are all there — all the eggs in one basket, you might say.

But there are hundreds of other prisoners at the federal prison complex known to the world as “ADX” or “Supermax” you likely have never heard of and who have made it to the facility because they have run into trouble at other prisons around the nation. The Aryan Brotherhood is represented at the prison, for example, and so are members of other notorious prison gangs. As a prisoner, you may be assigned to Supermax if you attack another inmate, or if you injure a guard, or if prison officials otherwise believe you present a particular threat to prison staff or other inmates.

Each of five prisoners named as plaintiffs in a new civil rights case filed Monday against the Bureau of Prisons fall into this category. So do the six other inmates whose stories are chronicled in the long complaint, which alleges that prison officials are failing or refusing to adequately diagnose and treat mentally ill prisoners in their care. In some cases, these men were mentally ill, or retarded, before they came to Colorado. In other cases, the inhumane treatment of the men has made them mad, or at least exacerbated their preexisting mental health problems.

The lawsuit, styled Bacote v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, seeks to force the federal officials to provide better mental health care for these inmates. But the litigation also raises fundamental questions about how the Bureau of Prisons treats these men. They are felons, violent felons in most cases, but even so they are entitled to be treated in a humane way by government officials. The Eighth Amendment, with its prescription against “cruel and unusual punishment,” commands this. And so do explicit federal laws and policies.

No evaluation of this new case, or of the fate of America’s mentally ill prisoners more generally, can be complete without a look into the narratives of the lives of the men who are being punished in this fashion. It is a haunting view. Their madness begets cruelty and indifference from prison officials and doctors. And the cruelty and indifference from the officials and doctors begets more madness. In the meantime, the American taxpayer pays for all of it; the alleged abuse and neglect, and even torture, is done in our name.

In our name — but not necessarily done for our own good. “One common misconception about ADX is that everybody there is never getting out of prison. That’s not true, and it’s one of the main problems with failing to treat the mentally ill while they are there,” says Ed Aro, a partner at Arnold & Porter, the venerable law firm that brought the lawsuit, along with the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs. Aro adds:

We currently represent almost 50 inmates who are or recently have been housed at ADX. One is already in the community and was released with no transitional assistance whatsoever. 11 more will be released within 5 years, 18 within 10 years and 28 within 20 years. Without treatment, these people will have a very difficult time reentering society safely and successfully.

Continue Reading @ The Atlantic

Take Action Monday’s for Davonate Sanford

18 Jun

Standing for the Innocent  has launched a new campaign to support Davontae Sanford. Take Action Monday’s asks that we call & email the Detroit District Attorney’s office and question why Sanford is still in prison.

The campaign started last week and will continue until July 30th.

Each and every Monday until July 30th-Make a call on behalf of Davontae Sanford to Kym Worthy the district attorney who prosecuted him.
Kym Worthy, DA
phone: 313 224-5777

email: prosecutor@co.wayne.mi.us
leave a msg if you cannot speak to her or an assistant.
Question- why they insist on keeping an innocent young man behind bars for a crime they KNOW he did not commit.

 

some facts:

1. A nation that prides itself as having the best justice system in the
world should tolerate no room for corruption, lies and misconduct that
sends an innocent child to prison for a crime he did not commit. Not
even for a day, much less 37-90 years in prison.
2. Nearly five years ago, on September 17, 2007, Davontae Sanford, a
fourteen year old mentally disabled boy who could only read on a second
grade level, and blind in one eye, left his home in his pajamas shortly
after 1 a.m. to investigate police activity at a home on Runyon Street
not far from his home. Curiously, as most children would do, Davontae
walked up to the scene and asked one of the officers what was going on.
One of the officers told him, “You know what’s going on,” and took him
into custody.
3. Davontae has suffered a
tremendous injustice- After hours of
interrogations that began at 4 a.m. and again at 9:30 p.m. that
following day, and after two police-prepared statements were put in
front of this 14 year old kid and told this is what he did, Davontae was
instructed to adopt the police officer’s typewritten confessions that
sent him to prison for 37-90 years – a virtual life sentence for a kid
who was only 14 years old. Tragically, he did not realize what they had
just done to him in that interrogation room.
In the first statement prepared at 4 a.m. by police, Davontae’s role
in the killing was not clear at all. He does not even place himself at
the scene of the crime. They knew they had a problem getting a
conviction with that statement because it was seriously lacking any
evidence of admissions of guilt to anything.

Seventeen hours later, at 9:30 p.m., they picked him up again, and
prepared another statement in which they told Davontae he actually
helped commit the murders and had him sign a confession to it all.
Davontae, who suffered from a reading comprehension disability, never
read either statement. It was read to him in a leading manner and he was
told to agree to its accuracy.

The interrogations were done in violation of
Michigan law that required a parent or attorney present for a child
under the age of 16 to ensure the proceedings were done without
violating his right to remain silent or to seek the assistance of
counsel. But we know from having watched the video of the interrogation
and having read the two statements prepared by Detroit Police, Davontae
did not confess to anything. Information from the crime scene was fed to
him by the interrogating officer who then leadingly asked Davontae if
the statements were true. Davontae, willing to please his interrogator,
answered affirmatively. And this they call a confession?
4. ballistics evidence at the crime
scene seriously undermined the statements in which the officers induced
Davontae to say he used a Mini-14 to help kill the victims. It is
undisputed that Mini-14 casings were not found at the scene.
It is also undisputed that police never found the Mini-14 they say in
Davontae’s statement that he used. Nor for that matter did the
prosecution ever argue that Davontae threw the gun away.
He did not commit
those murders, and they know it!
5. there was the confession and testimony by another
defendant, a total stranger to Davontae, who confessed to the crimes
with greater detail and for whom all the forensics evidence corroborated
his version of the murders – well known freelance self-professed hit
man Vincent Smothers. The AK-47 weapon Smothers admitted to using
matched the ballistics evidence found at the Runyon Street killings and
at the scene of another murder he committed. In addition, Smothers
identified an accomplice in the Runyon Street killings who used a 45
pistol, which when found, also clearly matched some of the casings and
bullets at the crime scene. Again, the forensics evidence in this case
clearly corroborated Smothers’ rendition of events that day in which he
confessed to committing the murders.

It does not stop there, ladies and gentlemen. Here’s some more truth
medicine that the prosecutor and Detroit Police have kept from the
public. In his various statements admitting to the Runyon Street
killings, Smothers also provided evidence that a .40 caliber pistol
taken from that home was used in yet another contract killing he carried
out on an officer’s wife at a CVS store in Detroit. Davontae, in his
statement, never mentioned anything about a 40 caliber pistol. That
makes sense, don’t you think when Detroit Police at the time they
prepared his statement did not know about the 40 caliber pistol until
Smothers confessed to the crime a year later!
Smothers
in his confession described in detail the amount of drugs and money
taken from the Runyon Street killings, a fact conspicuously missing from
Davontae’s so-called confession.
6.Kym Worthy, prosecutor in this case, is now attempting to silence Smothers! She and
Judge Sullivan of the Court, who recently denied Davontae’s motion to
withdraw his ill-advised guilty plea to these murders based on
newly-discovered evidence of Smothers’ confession. Smothers,
after several legal maneuvers with the prosecutor’s office in
attempting to get immunity in exchange for testifying on the witness in
Davontae’s favor, recently indicated to the Associated Press that he is
now willing to take the stand without a grant of immunity, feeling
atoned for his crimes after learning that Davontae was wrongfully
convicted of them based on police and prosecutorial misconduct in
extracting a bogus confession from him and inducing him to plea to the
murders!

https://www.facebook.com/events/310819479009571/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/standingupfortheinnocent/

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 12,820 other followers

%d bloggers like this: